-
Washington in Dilemma: Israeli Ambiguity Over Response Plans to Iranian Attack
-
Israel's lack of disclosure to the United States about details of its potential response reveals Tel Aviv's desire to maintain room for maneuver, potentially challenging strategic coordination between
The cancellation of Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant's scheduled visit to Washington has sparked a wave of speculation and questions about the nature of Israel's potential response to the recent Iranian missile attack.
Pentagon spokesperson Sabrina Singh announced the postponement of the visit, while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office described the visit as "pointless."
This development comes amid reports indicating that Israeli leaders have not informed the United States of specific details regarding their decision to respond to the Iranian attack.
U.S. sources revealed to NBC that American military officials discussed the possibility of supporting Israeli retaliation with intelligence or airstrikes, but without knowing Israel's final decision.
In a related context, U.S. sources reported that options still under consideration by the Israeli side include targeting Iranian military and intelligence infrastructure, air defenses, and energy facilities.
However, the sources confirmed that Iranian nuclear facilities were not among the potential targets discussed between the U.S. and Israeli defense ministers.
While the United States affirms its support for Israel's right to defend itself, American officials indicate that no decision has been made regarding any direct U.S. action.
The options range from providing intelligence support to the possibility of executing very limited strikes against Iranian targets, either inside Iran or abroad.
Some analysts view the cancellation of Gallant's visit as a possible indicator that the Israeli response is approaching, especially since Israel has previously conducted major military operations while its leaders were abroad.
Nevertheless, U.S. officials believe that Iran is not seeking a direct war with Israel and the United States unless a major attack is launched on its nuclear infrastructure.
These developments highlight the escalating tensions in the region and raise questions about the future of Israeli-American relations amid this crisis. They also highlight the challenges facing decision-makers in both countries in attempting to balance responding to Iranian threats and avoiding sliding into a full-scale regional war.
Levant-Agencies
You May Also Like
Popular Posts
Caricature
NATO Secretary-General Ex...
- November 7, 2024
Amid growing anxiety among several European countries participating in NATO over Donald Trump's victory in the U.S. presidential election, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte stated he looks forward to sitting down with Trump.
Upon arriving to participate in the summit of the European Political Community, which includes around forty heads of state in Budapest, he said, "I look forward to sitting with the elected U.S. president and seeing how we will collectively ensure we meet challenges, including the threats from Russia and North Korea." He also noted that the strengthening of ties between Russia and North Korea poses a threat to the United States as well, according to reports from Agence France-Presse.
Before Trump's victory, Rutte expressed confidence that a united Washington would remain part of the defensive alliance, even if Trump became the 47th president of the United States. In an interview with German public broadcaster ZDF last Monday night, he stated that both Republicans and Democrats understand that NATO serves not only the security of Europe but also that of America. He added that both candidates are aware that the security of the United States is closely tied to NATO.
On Wednesday, NATO congratulated Trump on his victory but did not address the Ukrainian issue.
It is noteworthy that the relationship between the elected U.S. president and the defense alliance was not the best during his first term in the White House. Trump criticized NATO member states multiple times and even hinted at withdrawing from the alliance unless they increased their financial contributions.
Additionally, the issue of the Russian-Ukrainian war is one of the matters that complicate relations between the two sides, especially since Trump has repeatedly stated that he can end this ongoing conflict, which began in 2022, quickly. He implied that he had a peace plan between Kyiv and Moscow, while his vice president, JD Vance, revealed aspects of that plan, which stipulated Ukraine's commitment not to join NATO, thereby sending reassuring signals to the Russians.
Furthermore, many NATO member states in Europe fear that Trump might halt military aid to Ukraine after he previously criticized the U.S. for pouring funds into supporting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
opinion
Report
ads
Newsletter
Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!