-
Labour crashes to humiliating byelection defeat in Hartlepool
Keir Starmer faces uncomfortable questions as party loses seat to Tories for the first time in 62 years
Labour has suffered a humiliating byelection defeat in Hartlepool after the party’s former heartland town elected a Conservative MP for the first time in 62 years.
The Tories won 15,529 votes, with Labour recording 8,589, according to official results. Jill Mortimer defeated the Labour candidate, Dr Paul Williams, by 6,940 votes. Mortimer won the byelection with more than half of the votes cast (51.88%) and a swing from Labour of almost 16%.
The loss of Hartlepool, which was declared at about 7am on Friday, leaves Labour’s leader, Keir Starmer, facing huge questions over the future direction of his party as yet more of its lifelong supporters vote for Boris Johnson’s Conservatives.
It is only the second time in nearly 40 years that a governing party has taken a seat from the opposition.
Speaking to reporters following the count, Jill Mortimer said: “I’m just overwhelmed by the support of the people of Hartlepool. It confirms what I heard on the doorstep - they just want positive change, and that’s what we’re going to bring them.”
She added: “This town needs to be regenerated, it has been in decline for a long time.”
Labour’s candidate Williams rushed out of the election count by the back door and was whisked off in a red Ford Fiesta.
He made no comment when asked repeatedly if he had anything to say to the people who voted for him, or whether Labour had any way back to office in this corner of north-east England.
The defeat came amid early signs of a torrid night for Labour in the local elections in England, with voters deserting the party for the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and in some cases the Green party. Ballots continue to be tallied up across England, Scotland and Wales after the “Super Thursday” polls – the largest test of political opinion outside a general election.
Labour appeared to concede defeat in Hartlepool shortly before 3am. Jim McMahon, the shadow minister who ran the party’s byelection campaign, said: “It’s pretty clear from the way that the ballots are landing that we are not close to winning this despite our best endeavours.”He said Labour had “held our own” and ran a “good campaign with integrity and a very positive vision for Hartlepool” but that it was for Hartlepudlians to choose “which vision they want to get behind”.
Asked whether he was officially conceding defeat, McMahon told Sky News: “We haven’t got over the line, that’s quite clear from the ballots. To what extent is too early to tell, but that’s pretty clear.
“For me, it’s about reflecting on what was a very difficult campaign to begin with … I’ve been here six weeks; I’ve enjoyed the campaign; I’ve enjoyed the town and its people and I’ve enjoyed working alongside our fantastic volunteers.”
On Friday morning, a Labour source said the party had not changed sufficiently.
“The message from voters is clear and we have heard it. Labour has not yet changed nearly enough for voters to place their trust in us. We understand that. We are listening. And we will now redouble our efforts.”
The byelection was a key test of Labour’s appeal to its traditional heartlands, just over a year after Starmer became leader with a pledge to rebuild the “red wall”.
However, Labour struggled to combat a deep disillusionment with the party in Hartlepool, a constituency it has held since 1964, and a historic shift in allegiances towards a Conservative party once considered toxic in north-east England.
The mood in the Labour camp overnight was dismal. Starmer was understood to have been told of the outlook at about midnight, shortly after his team arrived at its Hartlepool headquarters. One member of the team said it became clear at around midnight – while the votes were still being validated – that the Tories had racked up a “healthy majority”.
One Labour source said they expected the Conservatives to win by as many as 5,000 to 6,000 votes. Turnout for the contest was 42.55%, the lowest in years, although byelections generally record fewer voters.
There were grim faces all around the Mill House leisure centre, where the count was held under strict social distancing measures, as the morning wore on – even when a giant inflatable Boris Johnson was erected outside the sports hall at 4am.
https://twitter.com/JoshHalliday/status/1390509667927855107
The result in Hartlepool comes after several neighbouring Labour constituencies have fallen one by one to the Conservatives in recent years – six in the last general election – with post-industrial areas forming the bedrock of Johnson’s 81-seat majority in the Commons.
Labour has seen its share of the vote ebb away in Hartlepool over the past 15 years, though the switch to the Conservatives has been accelerated by Brexit. The town where it was once said people could “weigh Labour votes, not count them” has blamed Labour for the loss of steelmaking jobs as well as cuts to the local hospital and police – even though those were largely due to the Conservatives’ austerity programme.
There was unhappiness that Labour selected the pro-remain former neighbouring MP, Paul Williams, as its candidate in a town where 70% voted to leave the European Union.
Labour had been defending a narrow 3,595-vote majority in a town it has held since Harold Wilson was in Downing Street nearly 60 years ago. The byelection was called after Mike Hill, the MP since 2017, stood down over sexual harassment allegations, which he denies.
Elsewhere in England, the Tories seized Redditch and Nuneaton & Bedworth councils in the Midlands from Labour, along with Harlow in Essex, while Starmer’s party suffered heavy losses across north-east local authorities.
Results from the Holyrood election – where the issue of Scottish independence was a main feature in the campaign – will come through later on Friday and Saturday.
source: Josh Halliday
Levant
You May Also Like
Popular Posts
Caricature
NATO Secretary-General Ex...
- November 7, 2024
Amid growing anxiety among several European countries participating in NATO over Donald Trump's victory in the U.S. presidential election, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte stated he looks forward to sitting down with Trump.
Upon arriving to participate in the summit of the European Political Community, which includes around forty heads of state in Budapest, he said, "I look forward to sitting with the elected U.S. president and seeing how we will collectively ensure we meet challenges, including the threats from Russia and North Korea." He also noted that the strengthening of ties between Russia and North Korea poses a threat to the United States as well, according to reports from Agence France-Presse.
Before Trump's victory, Rutte expressed confidence that a united Washington would remain part of the defensive alliance, even if Trump became the 47th president of the United States. In an interview with German public broadcaster ZDF last Monday night, he stated that both Republicans and Democrats understand that NATO serves not only the security of Europe but also that of America. He added that both candidates are aware that the security of the United States is closely tied to NATO.
On Wednesday, NATO congratulated Trump on his victory but did not address the Ukrainian issue.
It is noteworthy that the relationship between the elected U.S. president and the defense alliance was not the best during his first term in the White House. Trump criticized NATO member states multiple times and even hinted at withdrawing from the alliance unless they increased their financial contributions.
Additionally, the issue of the Russian-Ukrainian war is one of the matters that complicate relations between the two sides, especially since Trump has repeatedly stated that he can end this ongoing conflict, which began in 2022, quickly. He implied that he had a peace plan between Kyiv and Moscow, while his vice president, JD Vance, revealed aspects of that plan, which stipulated Ukraine's commitment not to join NATO, thereby sending reassuring signals to the Russians.
Furthermore, many NATO member states in Europe fear that Trump might halt military aid to Ukraine after he previously criticized the U.S. for pouring funds into supporting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
opinion
Report
ads
Newsletter
Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!