Rwanda-UK deal on asylum-seekers draws mostly positive reactions
April 16, 2022, 7:23 am

Rwanda-UK deal on asylum-seekers draws mostly positive reactions

Rwanda-Kigali/Pixabay

The Xinhua reported, local reactions to a Rwanda-Britain deal to move asylum-seekers attempting to enter the United Kingdom to Rwanda for resettlement were mostly positive, with some expressing reservations.

The agreement was signed by British Home Secretary Priti Patel and Rwandan Foreign Minister Vincent Biruta in the Rwandan capital, Kigali, on Thursday (Apr 14).

Ismael Buchanan, senior lecturer at the Department of Political Science at the University of Rwanda, told Xinhua: "I believe welcoming asylum-seekers from the UK will change some people's views and negative comments about Rwanda's human rights record."

He said: "The choice of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda has logic in it. First of all, look at how far Rwanda has managed to welcome and integrate migrants from different parts of the world, including from Libya, Eritrea, and Burundi."

Buchanan said: "This demonstrates Rwanda's hospitality."

The United Nations refugee agency said Thursday that it remains "firmly opposed to arrangements that seek to transfer refugees and asylum-seekers to third countries in the absence of sufficient safeguards and standards." (File photo: Pixabay)

According to the Xinhua, Rwanda hosts nearly 130,000 refugees from neighboring Democratic Republic of the Congo and Burundi, as well as Afghanistan, and migrants evacuated from Libya.

Buchanan said: "Rwanda has committed herself to protecting vulnerable people around the world and to offering safe haven to those in need. This is what Rwanda is all about."

Boris Johnson seeks to put fine behind him with illegal immigration plan

Noel Barakamfitiye, a businesswoman in Kigali, said the resettlement program would "somehow" meet the needs among the at-risk people trying to settle in the UK.

She told Xinhua: "I welcome Rwanda's efforts for those whose lives are in danger to be evacuated. Saving lives should be a priority."

The United Nations refugee agency said Thursday that it remains "firmly opposed to arrangements that seek to transfer refugees and asylum-seekers to third countries in the absence of sufficient safeguards and standards."

Buchanan, however, said the refugees in Rwanda "enjoy a conducive environment and their rights are protected under various international laws."

UK draws up plan to detain male migrants who try to cross English Channel

Frederick Golooba-Mutebi, a researcher on politics and public affairs, described the uproar about the relocation plan as a "storm in a tea cup."

He said: "I think that Rwanda is capable of hosting the asylum-seekers from the UK. It is not like the asylum-seekers will be brought and locked up in jail; they will be hosted for as long as they wish to stay; those who don't want to stay will be free to leave."

Golooba-Mutebi underlined that those who criticize the relocation on the basis of Rwanda's human rights record are doing so "out of ignorance of what they are talking about."

The expected refugees' legislation after the migrants' tragedy in the English Channel

He said: "Why did no one make noise when Afghan refugees were brought to Rwanda or those from Libya? Several evacuees of various nationalities from Libya have been resettled to third countries; others are still in Rwanda. Can they produce a single refugee whose rights have been violated?"

The opposition Democratic Green Party of Rwanda said while it supports welcoming refugees who have chosen Rwanda as their first destination, it does not support receiving those who had chosen to go to the UK or other European countries.

The party said in a statement: "We think that rich countries including the UK should not shift their international obligation to receive refugees and transfer them to third countries, just because they have the money to influence and enforce their will," adding that the move is not sustainable.

Kurdish woman is first victim identified of mass drowning in English Channel

Rwandan Foreign Minister Biruta described the deal as a truly unique approach to addressing the global migration crisis by tackling root causes.

Rwanda and Britain have not mentioned how many asylum-seekers will be resettled, but under the five-year program, migrants from the UK will be integrated into communities across Rwanda, where they will be entitled to full protection under Rwandan law, equal access to employment, and enrolment in healthcare and social care services.

UK Home Secretary Patel said the relocation applies to illegal entrants to the UK who are exploited by criminal gangs to help them into Europe through desperate journeys.

The UK immigration system is broken and needs a wholesome reform, Priti Patel thinks

The British government said plan is aimed to end illegal people-smuggling across the English Channel.

Patel said that Britain is offering an upfront investment of 120 million pounds (156.9 million U.S. dollars) to facilitate the implementation of the agreement.

According to a joint statement, the funding will be injected into opportunities for the development of migrants and Rwandans in areas of secondary qualifications, vocational and skills training, language lessons, and higher education.

Judge criticises Priti Patel over policy for asylum seekers in pandemic

The Xinhua noted that media reports said more than 28,000 migrants and refugees reached Britain from mainland Europe on boats last year.

Source: xinhua

US man arrested after 183 frozen animals found in his freezer India receives more orders of Russian S-400 air defense systems

Upon arriving to participate in the summit of the European Political Community, which includes around forty heads of state in Budapest, he said, "I look forward to sitting with the elected U.S. president and seeing how we will collectively ensure we meet challenges, including the threats from Russia and North Korea." He also noted that the strengthening of ties between Russia and North Korea poses a threat to the United States as well, according to reports from Agence France-Presse.

Before Trump's victory, Rutte expressed confidence that a united Washington would remain part of the defensive alliance, even if Trump became the 47th president of the United States. In an interview with German public broadcaster ZDF last Monday night, he stated that both Republicans and Democrats understand that NATO serves not only the security of Europe but also that of America. He added that both candidates are aware that the security of the United States is closely tied to NATO.

On Wednesday, NATO congratulated Trump on his victory but did not address the Ukrainian issue.

It is noteworthy that the relationship between the elected U.S. president and the defense alliance was not the best during his first term in the White House. Trump criticized NATO member states multiple times and even hinted at withdrawing from the alliance unless they increased their financial contributions.

Additionally, the issue of the Russian-Ukrainian war is one of the matters that complicate relations between the two sides, especially since Trump has repeatedly stated that he can end this ongoing conflict, which began in 2022, quickly. He implied that he had a peace plan between Kyiv and Moscow, while his vice president, JD Vance, revealed aspects of that plan, which stipulated Ukraine's commitment not to join NATO, thereby sending reassuring signals to the Russians.

Furthermore, many NATO member states in Europe fear that Trump might halt military aid to Ukraine after he previously criticized the U.S. for pouring funds into supporting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.