-
WILL BRITAIN BE MORE ‘GLOBAL’ AFTER BREXIT?

Britain’s stormy general election campaign has not focused much on foreign policy issues or the country’s role in the wider world, though it has of course been dominated by Brexit and the economic implications of leaving the European Union after 45 years of membership.
Still, last week’s Nato summit near London was a vivid reminder of the fractious and turbulent times we live in. Boris Johnson, the Conservative prime minister, was photographed at a Buckingham Palace reception laughing along with France’s Emmanuel Macron and Canada’s Justin Trudeau about the “jaw-dropping” behaviour of Donald Trump, who occupied centre-stage at the meeting of the Atlantic Alliance on its 70th anniversary.
Johnson had feared above all that the ever-unpredictable American president would say something that might affect the outcome of the December 12 election – especially about discussions over the highly sensitive issue of whether Britain’s revered National Health Service might form part of a post-Brexit UK trade deal with the US. Trump insisted, to audible sighs of relief in 10 Downing Street, that this was not so.
Macron had warned in advance that Nato was “brain-dead” because of its inability to deal with Vladmir Putin’s Russia. He was angry too over Trump’s “green light” to Turkey to mount an offensive into northern Syria against the Kurdish fighters who had spearheaded the defeat of Isis – without consulting other allies.
And the weekend before the summit a convicted Islamist extremist killed two young people in a knife attack on London Bridge in the heart of the capital – a bleak example of mounting concerns about radicalization and terrorism.
If Britain does end up leaving the EU, Nato will matter even more than before. “Ultimately, keeping terror off our streets and deepening our security cooperation with our Nato partners are two sides of the same coin,” commented the foreign secretary, Dominic Raab.
In recent days there have been other disturbing observations about the implications of leaving. Donald Tusk, the outgoing president of the European Council, described Brexit as “the real end of the British Empire” and warned that if it happened then the UK would be relegated to a second-rate global player. Later he described Brexit as “one of the most spectacular mistakes” in EU history after a campaign marked by “an unprecedented readiness to lie.”
Ahead of the 2016 referendum Brexiteers, including Johnson, described their vision as a way to “seize back control” from Brussels and forge a path to a “Global Britain.” Those views were challenged at the time by the Remain camp. But evidence that has accumulated since then suggests neither ambition is achievable.
Analysts argue that one option is for Britain to fall back on bilateral relations with individual countries, especially the “big five” of France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain, though that would not bring automatic access to collective, members-only, EU consultations.
The “Global Britain” concept is associated with the Anglosphere – especially the “Five Eyes” intelligence group of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK, and the US – perhaps extending to the 53-member Commonwealth. But that geographically-dispersed virtual community is no substitute for full membership of a highly successful regional organisation that is also the largest single market on earth.
In an increasingly inter-connected world Britain is no longer uniquely qualified to act as hub – especially if it chooses to detach itself from its own immediate neighbourhood. It is also struggling to find the resources to support ambitious foreign and defence policies given the chaos of the past three years. The old claim about the “special relationship” with the US – and about serving as a bridge between America and Europe – is tired and unconvincing.
It is true that in the Middle East Britain has maintained its support for the 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran, along with the EU, despite Trump’s abandonment of the deal. The UK also denounced the US decision to recognise Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and its announcement that Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories were not in fact illegal. But it is legitimate to ask if those policies will survive Brexit.
And if the biggest challenge facing the world in the coming decades (as Nato leaders agreed) is the inexorable rise of China as an economic and military power, then how will “Global Britain” deal with that? The US has already applied pressure to ensure security of communications, including new 5G mobile phone networks, and wants allies to ban equipment from the world’s biggest telecoms manufacturer, the Chinese firm Huawei. Johnson insisted at the summit that he would not compromise Britain's national security over whether to give the telecoms giant a role in building the UK's 5G network. It was thus amusing to see, just the next day, when he gave another TV interview, that he took a selfie with the programme’s presenters with his smartphone and posted it on Instagram. That detail too, generated scornful headlines, as the phone turned out to be a Huawei.
You May Also Like
Popular Posts
Caricature
BENEFIT Sponsors BuildHer...
- April 23, 2025
BENEFIT, the Kingdom’s innovator and leading company in Fintech and electronic financial transactions service, has sponsored the BuildHer CityHack 2025 Hackathon, a two-day event spearheaded by the College of Engineering and Technology at the Royal University for Women (RUW).
Aimed at secondary school students, the event brought together a distinguished group of academic professionals and technology experts to mentor and inspire young participants.
More than 100 high school students from across the Kingdom of Bahrain took part in the hackathon, which featured an intensive programme of training workshops and hands-on sessions. These activities were tailored to enhance participants’ critical thinking, collaborative problem-solving, and team-building capabilities, while also encouraging the development of practical and sustainable solutions to contemporary challenges using modern technological tools.
BENEFIT’s Chief Executive Mr. Abdulwahed AlJanahi, commented: “Our support for this educational hackathon reflects our long-term strategic vision to nurture the talents of emerging national youth and empower the next generation of accomplished female leaders in technology. By fostering creativity and innovation, we aim to contribute meaningfully to Bahrain’s comprehensive development goals and align with the aspirations outlined in the Kingdom’s Vision 2030—an ambition in which BENEFIT plays a central role.”
Professor Riyadh Yousif Hamzah, President of the Royal University for Women, commented: “This initiative reflects our commitment to advancing women in STEM fields. We're cultivating a generation of creative, solution-driven female leaders who will drive national development. Our partnership with BENEFIT exemplifies the powerful synergy between academia and private sector in supporting educational innovation.”
Hanan Abdulla Hasan, Senior Manager, PR & Communication at BENEFIT, said: “We are honoured to collaborate with RUW in supporting this remarkable technology-focused event. It highlights our commitment to social responsibility, and our ongoing efforts to enhance the digital and innovation capabilities of young Bahraini women and foster their ability to harness technological tools in the service of a smarter, more sustainable future.”
For his part, Dr. Humam ElAgha, Acting Dean of the College of Engineering and Technology at the University, said: “BuildHer CityHack 2025 embodies our hands-on approach to education. By tackling real-world problems through creative thinking and sustainable solutions, we're preparing women to thrive in the knowledge economy – a cornerstone of the University's vision.”
opinion
Report
ads
Newsletter
Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!