-
What Encourages Erdogan’s Turkey to Intervene in the Middle East and North Africa?
Turkey’s expansion in the Middle East and North Africa has become very noticeable during recent years. This aggressive expansion is very vibrant in Kurdistan, Syria, Iraq, Libya, Somalia and elsewhere. Erdogan’s Turkey has used several means and has rested on numerous factors that reveal that this offensive enlargement at others expense is systematic and ideological.
These means and factors can be divided into internal and external.
For Erdogan, waging wars and making interferences into other countries affairs is an important source of gaining popularity at Turkish domestic level.
Likewise, it is a hot material of polarisation through municipal, parliamentary and presidential elections campaigns. The tendency of conducting external battles has become a fundamental part of Erdogan approach, especially when he has become the absolute ruler of Turkey since 2017.
Erdogan and his ruling party, The Justice and Development Party (AKP), have been suffering from multifaceted enormous difficulties. These issues almost include every single sector of life in Turkey. A recession in economy, lack of democracy, insecurity, political instability, local currency deterioration against the dollar, withdrawal of foreign investments, moving from zero-problems with neighbouring countries to zero-friends, and so on. Therefore, for Erdogan, the only way to attempt to salvage his political future and to remain in power is to distract national public opinion and to absorb local anger by waging wars and making interventions abroad.
Furthermore, Erdogan endeavours to stir up Turkish national and religious sentiments by showing himself as a historical leader who is trying to restore the glories of the ancient Ottoman Empire. In this context, Erdogan claims that Libya, to which Erdogan has sent about 16,000 Syrian mercenaries, was one of the relics of the property of his Ottoman ancestors until the year 1911, when Sultan Mehmed V abdicated Libya in favour of Italy. On the other hand, he pretends that Mosul and Kurdistan region including Kirkuk are also remnants of the defunct Ottoman sultanate, justifying his occupation of several regions in Iraqi Kurdistan.
Regionally, Erdogan has benefited from every single point that can push his plan to make interventions into other weak countries via incursions, invasions and occupation. Since the eruption of “the Arab Spring Events” in 2011, Erdogan has exploited the anarchy that swept the countries which witnessed mass protests and civil wars to get an illegitimate foothold in those countries. Therefore, Erdogan was very ecstatic at the beginning of the events of the Arab Spring, when massive popular demonstrations toppled the previous authoritarian regimes and brought the Muslim Brotherhood to power in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya.
In Syria, Erdogan embraced the Syrian opposition led by the Muslim Brotherhood and occupied dozens of Syrian cities and towns. Erdogan’s Turkey displaced hundreds of thousands of Kurds from their areas in Syrian Kurdistan. About 16,000 Syrian mercenaries were sent to Libya by Erdogan’s government to support the Brotherhood government in Tripoli and to fight the Libyan National Army. In Iraq, Turkey has occupied dozens of areas in Iraqi Kurdistan and built dozens of military bases.
Internationally, Erdogan is trying to take advantage of the contradictions between the United States and Russia in more than one place in the Middle East and North Africa, such as Syria, Iraq and Libya. Based on these inconsistencies, Erdogan has succeeded to a certain extent in expanding in neighbouring countries and the region. But, as it seems, Turkish expansion in the Middle East, North and East Africa is taking place under the tacit approval of the United States
and Russia. Instability in this region, as well as in most regions of the world, is a policy that is in the interest of the superpowers because this provides them with a permanent pretext for intervention, hegemony, and the sale of weapons. Similarly, this Turkish expansion takes place amid a failure and lack of European agreement towards this Turkish malignant behaviour, which shapes a blatant threat against European interests in Libya and the eastern Mediterranean.
Turkey has relatively succeeded, to date, to interfere in several countries of the Middle East and North Africa. The reason behind this is not because that Turkey is strong, but because it benefits from all the weaknesses of the targeted countries as well as from the dissimilarities among the major global players in those countries. These major players, apparently, admire
this Turkish salience as long as it does not form an explicit and direct threat to its interests in the region. In other words, until this moment, Turkey is moving and manoeuvring in the Middle East and North Africa within the framework permitted by America and Russia, otherwise it
would not have dared to do so
by : Jwan Dibo
