Amid the rapidly changing dynamics and growing regional tensions in the Middle East, different factions within the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) face substantial challenges that may reshape the party’s internal structure and ultimately determine the fate of its members. Syrian Kurds loyal to the PKK find themselves in a complex position, as rising international pressures against Iran and Turkey’s ongoing campaigns against the PKK raise the question of whether their interests are better served by remaining with the party or seeking a different path.

The Historical Relationship Between Syrian Kurds and the PKK

Historically, the Syrian wing of the PKK has had strong ties with the party’s leadership, allowing it to gain significant military, logistical, and political support. During the Syrian crisis, Syrian Kurds working with the PKK became a powerful force on the ground, particularly in northern and eastern Syria, benefiting from military expertise and training provided by the party. However, this connection has also meant a dependency on the PKK’s broader regional agenda, which is closely influenced by both Iranian and Turkish policies.

With the changes in Syria and the decline of ISIS, this relationship has come under scrutiny, as it has become apparent that remaining within the PKK structure might not serve Syrian Kurds’ long-term interests. Now, they are called to re-evaluate their position amid a tense regional environment and to balance the support they receive from the PKK against the political and military risks they may face.

Regional Challenges: The Transforming Positions of Iran and Turkey

Turkey poses a continuous threat to the PKK, viewing it as a terrorist organization that endangers its national security, and its military operations in Iraqi Kurdistan and northeastern Syria have increased in intensity. This escalation places considerable pressure on the PKK’s Syrian wing. On the other hand, certain PKK factions, especially those aligned with Iran, benefit from Iran’s regional interests, as Iran supports these factions as part of its own regional agenda to counter Turkish influence. This situation puts the Syrian wing in a delicate position, as its alliance with this faction ties it into a regional coalition with complex, overlapping conflicts and rising international tensions.

Internal Divisions within the PKK

Signs of internal divisions have begun to emerge within the PKK, reflecting differences between the political wing, which leans toward negotiating with Turkey and Syrians, and the military wing, which continues to carry out operations and claims responsibility for them. Recent statements from PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan, who is imprisoned in Turkey, about the possibility of negotiating with the Turkish government have raised questions about the continuity of the military wing, particularly given its conflicting stance of escalating attacks against Turkey. This divergence puts further pressure on Syrian Kurds affiliated with the PKK, who now hold considerable political sway in Syria. They are forced to navigate between the differing visions of the PKK’s political and military wings, which increases their risk, especially if the Iran-backed military wing chooses to escalate against Turkey, potentially putting them in direct confrontation with Turkish forces. Furthermore, these internal divisions threaten to undermine the cohesion of the party, leaving Syrian Kurds even more isolated on the Syrian political stage.

Potential Paths Forward for the Syrian Wing of the PKK

Faced with these challenges, the PKK’s Syrian wing may find itself at a critical juncture, where it must pursue independent paths or adopt new strategies to cope with the shifting dynamics in the region. Here are several potential options:

    1.    Continued Loyalty to the PKK
Should the Syrian wing choose to remain within the PKK, it will have to contend with the challenges posed by the party’s shifting, Iran-influenced agenda. This choice likely entails involvement in new regional conflicts and adherence to policies that may run counter to its local interests as a force striving for stability in northern and eastern Syria. While this path may afford temporary protection through military and logistical support, it ultimately exposes them to mounting pressures that could jeopardize their future.
    2.    Separation from the PKK and Pursuit of Political Independence
Another option is for the Syrian wing to break away from the PKK and form an independent entity that aligns with the Syrian context and adopts a political agenda removed from overlapping regional alliances. In this scenario, the Syrian wing could present itself as a Syrian Kurdish force dedicated to negotiations and participation in a broader Syrian political solution, potentially gaining international support and placing itself in a stronger position domestically. This approach would provide them with greater flexibility to forge new alliances with local and international forces and reduce their reliance on Iranian allies.
    3.    Focusing on Local Development and Avoiding Regional Conflicts
Syrian Kurds might prioritize securing local gains by aligning with other local Syrian forces and Kurdish groups unconnected to the PKK. This option would strengthen their influence in northern Syria and positively impact the region’s future, particularly with the international desire to stabilize Syria and end its protracted conflicts. This approach could mitigate confrontations with Turkey and help avoid direct clashes with other regional powers, as it seeks to establish local balances without interference in major international conflicts.
    4.    Shifting Towards Political Engagement Rather than Military Action
Given the significant pressures on the PKK due to its military activities, it may be in the best interests of Syrian Kurds to shift their focus toward political efforts within a long-term strategy aimed at achieving stability. Stepping back from military operations would allow them to pursue political opportunities on the Syrian stage, alleviating pressures and securing their recognition as a political force representing Kurds in any future solutions to the Syrian crisis.

Opening up to Other Kurdish Parties and Broader Syrian Partnerships

Amid these transformations, it is crucial for Syrian Kurds working within the PKK to recognize that their future interests may require them to expand their alliances and engage with other Kurdish parties in Syria after a potential separation, particularly by distancing themselves from the Iran-aligned PKK wing. Building partnerships based on common interests with the wider Syrian population can help foster Kurdish unity, equipping them to address the challenges threatening the stability of their regions.

By allying with other Syrian Kurdish parties, such as the Kurdish National Council or moderate opposition forces, they could form a more cohesive Syrian Kurdish front capable of contributing effectively to any potential political solutions. Collaboration with broader Syrian forces would also offer Kurds the chance to integrate into a national framework that serves the interests of all, reducing tensions stemming from regional affiliations.

Opening channels of communication with other Kurdish and Syrian factions would provide Syrian Kurds affiliated with the PKK with political legitimacy, enhancing their standing in Syria. This would also strengthen their chances of achieving a political solution free from external influences and regional pressures.

Conclusion

With growing international and regional pressures on Iran and the increasing scale of Turkish military actions, the PKK’s Syrian wing faces difficult choices requiring them to make decisive calls about their future. Remaining within the PKK guarantees military support but subjects them to multiple pressures, while breaking away offers greater independence and influence locally but may risk losing support.

Faced with this dilemma, the best option for Syrian Kurds may be to pursue a model that balances political independence with adaptation to Syria’s local realities. This approach could help safeguard their interests and ensure an independent standing that avoids the complexities of regional conflicts.

Levant - shiyar khaleal