Escalation Scenarios Between Russia and NATO in Ukraine
April 13, 2022, 12:04 pm

Escalation Scenarios Between Russia and NATO in Ukraine

Jwan Dibo

Perhaps the most prominent question regarding the current Russian-Ukrainian war is about the prospects for escalation scenarios between Russia and NATO.

Although NATO is not completely united in dealing with Russia, the Western alliance has not stopped supplying the Ukrainian army with weapons to continue the resistance.

However, the important question in this framework is to what extent NATO can help the Ukrainian army and not be drawn into a direct confrontation with Russia. So far, it seems that Russia and NATO agree on the current rules of the game, i.e., the continuation of the indirect combat between the two sides in Ukraine.

Yet, there is no guarantee that this situation will continue forever, especially in light of the current impasse at the diplomatic level. That is why NATO ministers met last week to discuss the extent to which the Western alliance can help the Ukrainian army.

If the military aid provided by NATO to the Ukrainian army so far has helped the Ukrainians to resist the second army in the world, this may prompt NATO to study the likelihood of providing more sophisticated weapons. That is why the Ukrainian president has long asked NATO to deliver advanced weapons to the Ukrainian army, such as tanks, warplanes, drones, and advanced air and missile defence systems.

At the same time, NATO hawks such as the United States and Britain are satisfied that Ukraine - as they believe- is gradually turning into a quagmire to drain Russia. This explains why the two countries have not made any serious attempts to resolve the crisis diplomatically. On the contrary, the two countries are working in one way or another to disrupt the diplomatic efforts of France and Germany.

In this context, possible scenarios are: 1- NATO continues to provide the current quality and quantity of weapons that have proven their effectiveness in resisting the Russian army. 2- Russia's targeting of arms convoys coming from Eastern European countries that are members of NATO to Ukraine. This, if repeated, could force NATO into a direct clash with Russia. 3- NATO may intervene directly if Russia uses internationally prohibited weapons against the Ukrainians. 4- NATO provides advanced weapons to the Ukrainian army with the aim of achieving victory, not only resistance. But this step may push Russia to use its huge nuclear arsenal, which the Russian president has long threatened to use it.

So far, it seems that NATO, led by Washington and London, tends to manage the Ukrainian crisis so that Ukraine will slowly turn into a swamp from which it is difficult for Russia to get out. Therefore, there is no unified NATO strategy aimed at resolving the crisis peacefully.

The difficult task for NATO remains how to provide the most advanced weapons to the Ukrainian army to resist the Russian invasion without turning this war into a third world war in which Europe pays the heaviest price.

BY: Jwan Dibo

Leaders of Poland and Baltic states head to Kyiv to meet Ukraine's President Finland, Sweden to decide whether to join NATO amid Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

Upon arriving to participate in the summit of the European Political Community, which includes around forty heads of state in Budapest, he said, "I look forward to sitting with the elected U.S. president and seeing how we will collectively ensure we meet challenges, including the threats from Russia and North Korea." He also noted that the strengthening of ties between Russia and North Korea poses a threat to the United States as well, according to reports from Agence France-Presse.

Before Trump's victory, Rutte expressed confidence that a united Washington would remain part of the defensive alliance, even if Trump became the 47th president of the United States. In an interview with German public broadcaster ZDF last Monday night, he stated that both Republicans and Democrats understand that NATO serves not only the security of Europe but also that of America. He added that both candidates are aware that the security of the United States is closely tied to NATO.

On Wednesday, NATO congratulated Trump on his victory but did not address the Ukrainian issue.

It is noteworthy that the relationship between the elected U.S. president and the defense alliance was not the best during his first term in the White House. Trump criticized NATO member states multiple times and even hinted at withdrawing from the alliance unless they increased their financial contributions.

Additionally, the issue of the Russian-Ukrainian war is one of the matters that complicate relations between the two sides, especially since Trump has repeatedly stated that he can end this ongoing conflict, which began in 2022, quickly. He implied that he had a peace plan between Kyiv and Moscow, while his vice president, JD Vance, revealed aspects of that plan, which stipulated Ukraine's commitment not to join NATO, thereby sending reassuring signals to the Russians.

Furthermore, many NATO member states in Europe fear that Trump might halt military aid to Ukraine after he previously criticized the U.S. for pouring funds into supporting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.